ABSTRACT
Phenylketonuria (PKU) is a rare genetic condition caused by inborn error(s) in the gene for the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase. Resulting loss of phenylalanine (Phe) metabolism requires strict dietary therapy and/or medication to prevent toxic accumulation of Phe. Novel investigational therapies, including gene therapies that aim to address underlying causes of PKU, are now entering clinical trials. However, perceptions of this technology in the PKU community have not been assessed. We conducted a qualitative survey recruiting adult patients, caregivers, and patient advocates from the US and 3 EU countries to assess the impact of living with PKU and the perceptions of gene therapy. Telephone interviews were conducted for up to 60 min following a standardized discussion guide. Interviewers classified each participant by their level of knowledge regarding gene therapy as either: low (little or no prior awareness); moderate (awareness of gene therapy as a concept in PKU); or high (working knowledge of gene therapy, e.g., vectors). In total, 33 participants were recruited (patients, n = 24; caregivers, n = 5; advocates, n = 4). The patient sample was well balanced among age groups, sex, and US/EU geographies. The participants' experiences and burden of living with PKU were largely negative, characterized by frustrations with current management consistent with prior reports. Most participants (n = 18/33) were identified as displaying moderate gene-therapy knowledge, 10/33 as displaying high knowledge, and 5/33 as displaying low knowledge. Both positive and negative perceptions were observed; positive perceptions were often linked to "hope" that gene therapy may represent a cure, whereas negative perceptions were linked to the "uncertainty" of outcomes. High knowledge of gene therapy appeared to trend with negative perceptions; 7/10 participants from this group reported high levels of concern over gene therapy. In contrast, participants who displayed low knowledge reported low (n = 3/5) or moderate (n = 2/5) concern, with predominantly positive perceptions. These data highlight the need for education around the theoretical risk:benefit profile of gene therapy. Despite current unknowns around gene therapy, our study demonstrates the important role of healthcare providers as educators who can use available data to provide balanced information to patients and caregivers.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID19 pandemic urged the need to take severe measures for reducing the epidemic spread. Lockdowns were imposed throughout countries and even Inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) affected patients had to face it and adapt, with management strategies changes coming along. Phenylketonuria (PKU) is an inborn error of phenylalanine (Phe) metabolism causing, when not treated, blood Phe increases and consequent central nervous system (CNS) damage. Dietary intervention is the main recognized treatment and must be maintained long-life, however adherence is often suboptimal in adulthood. Aim of this study was to evaluate whether and how the pandemic had impacted PKUs metabolic control and what factors may have played a role as potential modifiers. METHODS: Patients ≥4 yo and in follow-up at our Metabolic Clinic were enrolled in this study, divided into subgroups according to age (GROUP A < 12 yo; GROUP B ≥ 12 yo). Videoconsults were conducted on a minimum monthly basis and collected DBS were studied and compared to previous year same time-period in order to evaluate possible changes. RESULTS: 39% of patients (n = 121) increased the number of performed DBS. "Non-compliant" patients were reduced (11-3%) with a - 14% of patients with mean Phe levels >600 umol/l and a - 8% of patients with 100% DBS above same level. GROUP A maintained substantially unchanged metabolic control among two analyzed time-periods. On the contrary, GROUP B demonstrated significant reductions in mean blood Phe concentrations (p < 0.0001) during the pandemic (mean 454 umol/l, SD ± 252, vs. 556.4 umol/l, SD ± 301). DISCUSSION: COVID19 pandemic strongly impacted people's life with lifestyle habits changing consistently. PKU patients had to adapt their dietary restrictions to the new environment they were exposed to and, if younger patients could have been less exposed (meals strictly according to diet plan independently from setting), adolescent and adults strongly reflected the obligation to stay home by showing better metabolic control. Multiple factors could have played a role in that and the availability of teleconsultancy may have contributed allowing easier connections, but our data demonstrate how the pandemic and the environment can strongly impact PKUs adherence to treatment and how removing distance barriers can ameliorate and optimize metabolic compliance.